Comments on: In Defense of Quick and Dirty http://doodleplex.com/glassmaze/in-defense-of-quick-and-dirty/ Every jumbled pile of person Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:54:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: lapsed.cannibal http://doodleplex.com/glassmaze/in-defense-of-quick-and-dirty/comment-page-1/#comment-8797 lapsed.cannibal Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:22:41 +0000 http://doodleplex.com/glassmaze/?p=514#comment-8797 <p>Good point, and holy crap. Y2K+8. I think I still have some bottled water left over from 2000.</p> <p>37Signals just dropped support for IE6. I think they should preemptively drop support for IE8, too. As should we all.</p> Good point, and holy crap. Y2K+8. I think I still have some bottled water left over from 2000.

37Signals just dropped support for IE6. I think they should preemptively drop support for IE8, too. As should we all.

]]> By: Z http://doodleplex.com/glassmaze/in-defense-of-quick-and-dirty/comment-page-1/#comment-8796 Z Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:55:24 +0000 http://doodleplex.com/glassmaze/?p=514#comment-8796 <p>As additional food for thought in regards to browser sniffing, I have read that Microsoft has sucummed to "defaulting" IE 8 to be standards compliant. Yes, that means that all versions of IE before it defaulted to Microsoft compliant. The issue now is that once IE 8 comes into the marketplace an estimated billion websites (including intranet and browser-based applications) will break. In my opinion this will be a much larger issue than Y2K ever was.</p> As additional food for thought in regards to browser sniffing, I have read that Microsoft has sucummed to “defaulting” IE 8 to be standards compliant. Yes, that means that all versions of IE before it defaulted to Microsoft compliant. The issue now is that once IE 8 comes into the marketplace an estimated billion websites (including intranet and browser-based applications) will break. In my opinion this will be a much larger issue than Y2K ever was.

]]>