<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Language Abuse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doodleplex.com/glassmaze/language-abuse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doodleplex.com/glassmaze/language-abuse/</link>
	<description>Every jumbled pile of person</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:47:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: harvey</title>
		<link>http://doodleplex.com/glassmaze/language-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-14120</link>
		<dc:creator>harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodleplex.com/wordpress/?p=429#comment-14120</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;hi kiteen add me .. will chat later ..its brar_bluestar&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi kiteen add me .. will chat later ..its brar_bluestar</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kitten the lover</title>
		<link>http://doodleplex.com/glassmaze/language-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-4242</link>
		<dc:creator>kitten the lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodleplex.com/wordpress/?p=429#comment-4242</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;k i guess im the nly ne thats here well bye then o_o&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>k i guess im the nly ne thats here well bye then o_o</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kitten the lover</title>
		<link>http://doodleplex.com/glassmaze/language-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-3958</link>
		<dc:creator>kitten the lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodleplex.com/wordpress/?p=429#comment-3958</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;hey any GUYS wanna talk&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey any GUYS wanna talk</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pandora</title>
		<link>http://doodleplex.com/glassmaze/language-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-964</link>
		<dc:creator>Pandora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 22:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodleplex.com/wordpress/?p=429#comment-964</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;poo&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;PING:
TITLE: Post It #20 &#124; tail -f carlo.log
BLOG NAME: 
[...] languages. English is degrading each and every day, says Glass Maze&#8217;s lapsed cannibal in a amusing, yet angry [...]
PING:
TITLE: Language &#171; Insert Title Here
[...] Language Filed under: Humor &#8212; Jared @ 9:08 am   I just want to say that, in terms of it&#8217;s humor, language on the internet is a funny thing. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>poo</p>

<p>PING:
TITLE: Post It #20 | tail -f carlo.log
BLOG NAME: 
[...] languages. English is degrading each and every day, says Glass Maze&#8217;s lapsed cannibal in a amusing, yet angry [...]
PING:
TITLE: Language &laquo; Insert Title Here
[...] Language Filed under: Humor &#8212; Jared @ 9:08 am   I just want to say that, in terms of it&#8217;s humor, language on the internet is a funny thing. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lapsed cannibal</title>
		<link>http://doodleplex.com/glassmaze/language-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-963</link>
		<dc:creator>lapsed cannibal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodleplex.com/wordpress/?p=429#comment-963</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anonymous - I completely agree. What I love about English is its flexibility, its promiscuity, its willingness to steal from everywhere and everyone and to constantly revolutionize itself.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But words like these bug me because they&#039;re ugly and inelegant and unnecessary and they sound &lt;em&gt;horrible&lt;/em&gt;. Why do this stuff to the language if you don&#039;t have to?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For example: at some point in our history some English nobleman got tired of telling his other nobleman buddies about all of the peasants he was throwing out of windows -- because there was no &lt;em&gt;word&lt;/em&gt; for throwing people out of windows, and it was a pain in the ass saying &quot;threw the peasant out the window&quot; over and over again. He&#039;d have to say: &quot;Yeah, this peasant came to me today with this long boring story about how he and his family were &lt;em&gt;starving&lt;/em&gt; or something because I kept taking all their food, so I threw him out the window.&quot; Or: &quot;My god I&#039;m bored. You know what I need? Some throwing-peasants-out-of-windows. Jeeves! Fetch me some peasants!&quot; Too many damn syllables.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So he invented the word &quot;defenestrate&quot;, stealing fenetre from French, mutating it, and then adding suffixes and prefixes as necessary. I have no problem with that. It sounds pretty good, and it fills a void.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;That&#039;s&lt;/em&gt; how to grow a language.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;PS for the kiddies: Throwing people out of windows is wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous &#8211; I completely agree. What I love about English is its flexibility, its promiscuity, its willingness to steal from everywhere and everyone and to constantly revolutionize itself.</p>

<p>But words like these bug me because they&#8217;re ugly and inelegant and unnecessary and they sound <em>horrible</em>. Why do this stuff to the language if you don&#8217;t have to?</p>

<p>For example: at some point in our history some English nobleman got tired of telling his other nobleman buddies about all of the peasants he was throwing out of windows &#8212; because there was no <em>word</em> for throwing people out of windows, and it was a pain in the ass saying &#8220;threw the peasant out the window&#8221; over and over again. He&#8217;d have to say: &#8220;Yeah, this peasant came to me today with this long boring story about how he and his family were <em>starving</em> or something because I kept taking all their food, so I threw him out the window.&#8221; Or: &#8220;My god I&#8217;m bored. You know what I need? Some throwing-peasants-out-of-windows. Jeeves! Fetch me some peasants!&#8221; Too many damn syllables.</p>

<p>So he invented the word &#8220;defenestrate&#8221;, stealing fenetre from French, mutating it, and then adding suffixes and prefixes as necessary. I have no problem with that. It sounds pretty good, and it fills a void.</p>

<p><em>That&#8217;s</em> how to grow a language.</p>

<p>PS for the kiddies: Throwing people out of windows is wrong.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://doodleplex.com/glassmaze/language-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doodleplex.com/wordpress/?p=429#comment-962</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;English is a remarkably adaptable language that supports and envelopes these weird permutations readily.  In an almost biological fashion, the ability to sustain mutations while continuing to make enough sense to carry on day-today life is an evolutionary advantage for a language.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not saying that this particular example is pretty, but language changes gradually over time.  What would ye olde English poets think about our current language stylings?  The sheer lack of the letter &#039;u&#039; would likely cause conniptions, but we seem to get by just fine.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Either that or I forgot to take my curmudgeon pills this morning.  ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>English is a remarkably adaptable language that supports and envelopes these weird permutations readily.  In an almost biological fashion, the ability to sustain mutations while continuing to make enough sense to carry on day-today life is an evolutionary advantage for a language.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m not saying that this particular example is pretty, but language changes gradually over time.  What would ye olde English poets think about our current language stylings?  The sheer lack of the letter &#8216;u&#8217; would likely cause conniptions, but we seem to get by just fine.</p>

<p>Either that or I forgot to take my curmudgeon pills this morning.  ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
